SMRT rail accident points to more than safety lapse

Source:
MOM and LTA issue interim safety procedures to SMRT amidst ongoing investigations
http://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/singapore/mom-and-lta-issue-interim-safety-procedures-to-smrt-amidst-ongoing-investigations/ar-BBr9LGg?li=BBr8Cnr

As reported, the findings to the SMRT train accident will be reviewed by a panel comprising independent safety experts and the members of the SMRT Board Risk Committee, says the transport operator. Let’s hope that the “real” findings and recommended actions are published for learning purposes.

LTA and MOM had issued strict requisites for SMRT staff to follow when they carry out maintenance works during service hours. Anyone could read about these interim safety procedures mandated but three key areas come to my mind:

Who is  the Boss?                                                     
                                                                                                                                          
I believe there would be a slew of recommended safety actions by independent safety experts but how many would be accepted for implementation? The question to ask is who is the real boss who ultimately makes all the decisions : to do or not to do?  Can we stop service, repair and maintenance works during service hours and run the risks of being penalized for disruptions and complaints? Most likely this is not going to happen. Everyone knows our train services cannot stop because there is no alternative. If you have been relying on trains to get from point A to B, you pray that service is not disrupted because there is no alternative. There is no bus service that runs parallel to each network line. If you are taking the bus routes to reach your destination, you have to spend hours waiting and make multiple bus transfer. Nobody does this unless you are a tourist here for sigh-seeing and has hours to spare.

Safe Work Procedures                                                                                                                                                        
I strongly believe SMRT has tons of safe work procedures or safe operating procedures for every work activity. Any non-compliances should have been raised during periodic internal audits and actions taken. The question to ask is : are staff adhering to these procedures and what leading indicators have be tracked to show any trend?

In this accident where a team was dispatched to check on the faulty monitoring device near the track, does it comply to procedures to send a team of 15men? Who had authorized this entry (who puts 15 men at risk) onto the tracks while the trains were still running?

Risk Assessments                                                                                                                                                     
I hope the Safety Managers would seriously review this and all existing risk control measures for their work activities. Priority should be given on those activities that need to be performed during service hours. The most effective risk control measures is by elimination of risks (i.e. perform work after service hours). The next control is through substitution (can we use robots or remote means to check things instead of deploying men physically on the tracks?). Next alternative is via engineering controls where technology could be deployed to isolate trains moving into work zones. Relying on administrative controls is one of the least effective to prevent accidents or near misses. When such controls are forgotten or not complied with, it becomes “safety lapses” as mentioned in this case.    

 

Fall Prevention Plan (FPP)

Fall Prevention Plan (applies to Singapore context)  

Background:

WSH(Work at Height) Regulations applies to all factories and all workplaces effective from 01May2015.

I often get asked by SMEs, Contractors and Service Providers why they did not have a Fall Prevention Plan (FPP) when their clients / customer ask them.

Here are my answers to them:

1.     What is a Fall Prevention Plan (FPP)?  

     A documented site-specific plan prepared for the purpose of eliminating or reducing the risk of falls by ensuring that all reasonable fall prevention measures and methods have been implemented, prior to the commencement of work.

2.     Which workplaces are required to have a FPP ?   

·    Worksite

·    Shipyard

·    Factory-petroleum / products, petrochemicals / products

·    Premises – bulk storage toxic / flammable liquid, storage capacity 5,000 or more cu.metres

·    Factory-pharmaceutical products / their intermediates,

·    Factory-semiconductor wafers

·    Workplaces not in above categories but with 50 or more persons employed.

 

3.     Who is responsible for the establishment & implementation of a FPP?    

WSH law : WSH(Work-at-Height) Regulations 5.(1) states that :

“It shall be the duty of the occupier of every workplace specified in the Schedule, and in which work at height is carried out to establish and implement a fall prevention plan.”

 

4.     We don’t have work-at-height activities in our workplace, do I need a FPP? 

No. 

 

5.     Who is responsible for the training of workers working-at-height (WAH)?

WSH(Work-at-Height) Regulations (6) states that :

“It shall be the duty of the responsible person of any person who carries out or is to carry out any work at height to ensure that the person shall work at height in a workplace only after he has first received adequate safety and health training to familiarize himself with the hazards associated with work at height and the precautions to be observed.”

  

6.     Who is the responsible person? 

In relation to a person who carries out or is to carry out any work at height, means :

·    His employer, or

·    Principal (under whose direction he carries out or is to carry out any such work)

Responsible Person = Occupier, SMEs, Contractors, Service Providers, etc.